Legal Opinion
In Re Allman
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 12, 2002No. 02-00654-BHC-RJHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTOR’S HOMESTEAD CLAIM
RANDOLPH J. HAINES, Bankruptcy Judge.
Chapter 7 Debtor Thomas M. Allman claims lots 426 and 427 of the Golden Shores Ranchos Unit 2 subdivision as his exempt homestead pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 33-1101. 1 William E. Pierce, the Chapter 7 Trustee, objects to the inclusion of lot 427 as part of the Debtor’s exempt homestead, because the Debtor’s mobile home residence is on lot 426 and the adjacent lot 427 is vacant. Moreover, the Debtor purchased lot 427 after he purchased lot 426.
Only oral…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matcha v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Wuicich v. Solomon-Wickersham Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
- In Re Quentin B. Stenzel, Debtor. Peoples' State Bank of Wells v. Quentin B. StenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Wheeler Perry Co. v. Mortgage Bond Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Kwiecinski v. Community First National Bank of Powell (In Re Kwiecinski)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Calderon v. Lang (In Re Calderon)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- In re the Marriage of BakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- In Re GlimcherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2011