Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Baker
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 10, 2009No. 27242-7-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*210¶1 Mary L. Baker appeals the trial court’s decision to deny execution upon one of five contiguous parcels of land belonging to her former husband, Jayhu C. Baker, that he claimed exempt under the homestead act, chapter 6.13 RCW. Ms. Baker appeals, arguing the homestead exemption does not apply to parcels of property not occupied by a judgment debtor. Because Mr. Baker resides on one of the contiguous parcels, and no other exemption issues are raised, we affirm the trial court.
Brown, J.
FACTS
¶2 In dissolving the parties’ marriage, the court awarded Ms. Baker a $2,000,000 judgment with interest…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Schermer v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Dependency of SchermerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- McCray v. Miller &8212 Bland v. BlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City Of Seattle, Petitioner/cross-respondent v. Steven G. Long, Respondent/cross-petitionerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- City Of Seattle, Petitioner/cross-respondent v. Steven G. Long, Respondent/cross-petitionerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020