Legal Opinion
T.S. v. Independent School District No. 54
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 10, 2001No. 00-6165PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
T.S. was a high school student who was entitled to certain services pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. His education program was part of an Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) under which Independent School District Number 54 provided T.S. with a free and appropriate public education (FAPE). See 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d). T.S. appeals the denial of a due process hearing on the failure of the school district to provide the procedural safeguards required by the IDEA. We find that neither we nor the district court have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Urban Ex Rel. Urban v. Jefferson County School District R-1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- John Doe, a Minor, by and Through His Parent and Next Friend, Mary Doe v. ICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Board of Education of Oak Park & River Forest High School District 200 v. Nathan R., by and Through His Parents and Next Friends, Richard and Nancy R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- D.L. v. Unified School District No. 497Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Adam J. Ex Rel. Robert J. v. Keller Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Thompson R2-J School v. LUKE P., EX REL. JEFF P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Garcia v. Board of Education of Albuquerque Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Schoenbach v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.