Legal Opinion
Save Our Valley v. Sound Transit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2003No. 01-36172PublishedCited by 239 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge BERZON.
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
Save Our Valley, a community group, challenges the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority’s plan to build a light-rail line through the Rainier Valley south of Seattle, Washington. Save Our Valley argues that the project will have the effect of discriminating against Rainier Valley residents based on race in violation of a Department of Transportation regulation. The primary question before us is whether that Department of Transportation regulation creates an individual federal right that can be enforced under…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by239 opinions
- Kathleen Lentini v. California Center for the Arts, Escondido Alan Corbin Randy Vogel, and Does 1-10Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- John Draper v. D. RosarioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Champion Produce, Inc. v. Ruby Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- D.D. ex rel. V.D. v. New York City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- The State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc., the State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.