Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Ruth H.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1972No. Crim. 20051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUNN, J.

Ruth H., a minor, appeals from an order (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 800) entered January 13, 1971, in a juvenile proceeding in the superior court held under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, wherein appellant was adjudged to be a ward of the court and ordered placed under supervision of the probation officer in the home of her grandparents.

On August 12, 1971, the court entered an order reading, in part: “Case dismissed.” The Attorney General asks us to dismiss the present appeal as being moot by virtue of the order of dismissal. We treat the so-called “dismissal” as more…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Cunha v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Inmates of Sybil Brand Institute for Women v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. San Diego Health & Human Services Bureau v. Pamela J.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. Guillermo M.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. K.S.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. In Re KsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API