Inmates of Sybil Brand Institute for Women v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, J.
Plaintiffs in a class action brought on behalf of “all women who are or in the future will be incarcerated at Sybil Brand Institute for Women” against the County of Los Angeles and others, appeal from judgment entered therein, contending:
1. The due process clause of the California Constitution mandates strict scrutiny of substantial restraints on pretrial detainees’ liberty beyond those which inhere in detention.
2. The challenged substantive restraints on pretrial detainees are imposed on the basis of wealth and therefore must be subjected to strict scrutiny under the equal…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Johnny L. Spain v. Raymond K. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re HeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Bunch v. Coachella Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Planned Parenthood v. AakhusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Cisneros v. U.D. Registry, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.