Legal Opinion
Hauret v. Pedelaborde
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1926No. Docket No. 3080PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Action for an accounting. Plaintiff had judgment against the defendant for $300. Defendant appeals.
On or about the seventh day of February, 1921, pursuant to an agreement relative to the purchase and sale of an interest in a certain laundry business conducted in the city of Fresno, county of Fresno, state of California, the defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff an instrument in writing, of which the following is a true copy:
“February 7th, 1921.
“Received of Henry Hauret the sum of Four Hundred ($400.00) Dollars on account of the sum of Twelve Hundred ($1200.00) Dollars, which said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Von Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Harper v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Brown v. CantyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Knowles v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Warburton v. KieferleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Tolmie v. San Diego Fruit and Produce Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Weir v. Silver Bow CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1942