Bogle v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. The petition asserted a number of different claims for relief, some of which were alleged through petitioner’s appointed counsel, and others which were alleged pro se. The post-conviction court denied relief on the merits on the claims asserted through counsel, but declined to consider the pro se claims.
On appeal, petitioner has filed two briefs: one through counsel and one pro se supplemental brief. In the brief submitted through counsel, petitioner assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to consider…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Johnson v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bogle v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Lopez v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Winstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Bell v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Hieu Doan Truong v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.