Legal Opinion

Bogle v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 2017No. 13C14935; A160042PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. The petition asserted a number of different claims for relief, some of which were alleged through petitioner’s appointed counsel, and others which were alleged pro se. The post-conviction court denied relief on the merits on the claims asserted through counsel, but declined to consider the pro se claims.

On appeal, petitioner has filed two briefs: one through counsel and one pro se supplemental brief. In the brief submitted through counsel, petitioner assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to consider…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Johnson v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bogle v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Lopez v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Winstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Bell v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Hieu Doan Truong v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API