Legal Opinion

Major v. Auto Club Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1990No. Docket 109072PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals by leave granted the denial of its motion for summary disposition. MCR 2.116(0(10). This action involves a claim by plaintiff against defendant for payment of medical benefits pursuant to the no-fault insurance act, MCL 500.3109; MSA 24.13109. The sole issue before this Court is whether an insured, who pays a reduced premium to the no-fault insurer in exchange for coordinated medical benefits coverage, is required to seek benefits from the primary insurer before seeking payment from the no-fault insurer. We answer in the affirmative and reverse the trial court’s decision.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ReistMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Group Health PlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Morgan v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tousignant v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Check Reporting Services, Inc v. Michigan National Bank-LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. American Medical Security, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Kincaid v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Isom v. Limitorque Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API