Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. City of Flint

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 2015No. Docket 318906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

Plaintiffs, all residents of defendant the city of Flint, appeal as of right the order of the circuit court granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition and denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint. We reverse and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

On August 15, 2011, defendant’s finance director, Michael Townsend, sent to the city council and mayor a notice of a proposed 35% water and sewer rate increase to be effective September 6, 2011. The increase was proposed to meet a projected fiscal year deficit in the sewer fund of $14,789,666 as well as a water fund deficit of $8,078,917. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Fast Air, Inc v. KnightMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Cuddington v. United Health Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Miller v. Chapman ContractingMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gary B. v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  2. Deep Harbor Condominium Association v. Marine Adventure LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Gary B. v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  4. Larry Shears v. Douglas BingamanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Lawrence Washington Jr v. GovernorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API