Legal Opinion

Dill-Cramer-Truitt Corp. v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 24, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

Tbe essential facts of tbis case are as follows:

1. On 9 August, 1905, Elijah Hardison and others conveyed to Jesse Lukens, by deed, in proper form and duly registered, a quantity of timber, situate in Onslow County, together with certain timber rights and privileges, as contained in the following pertinent provisions of said deed :

“And the said parties of the first part hereby grant and assure unto the said party of the second part, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, a term of ten years from this date, subject to the right of extension, hereinafter provided for, within which to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bateman v. Kramer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Lumber Co. v. Corey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Ward v. . AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Hardy v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Thomason v. . BescherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whitehurst v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Samonds v. CloningerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Samonds v. . CloningerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Whitehurst v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Munger & Bennett, Inc. v. East Carolina Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API