Dill-Cramer-Truitt Corp. v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
Tbe essential facts of tbis case are as follows:
1. On 9 August, 1905, Elijah Hardison and others conveyed to Jesse Lukens, by deed, in proper form and duly registered, a quantity of timber, situate in Onslow County, together with certain timber rights and privileges, as contained in the following pertinent provisions of said deed :
“And the said parties of the first part hereby grant and assure unto the said party of the second part, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, a term of ten years from this date, subject to the right of extension, hereinafter provided for, within which to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bateman v. Kramer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Lumber Co. v. Corey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Ward v. . AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Hardy v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Thomason v. . BescherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whitehurst v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Samonds v. CloningerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Samonds v. . CloningerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Whitehurst v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Munger & Bennett, Inc. v. East Carolina Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.