Legal Opinion

Uland v. National City Bank of Evansville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1983No. 1-782A198PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEAL, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendants-appellants Theodore B. Uland (Ted) and Marylou Uland (Marylou) appeal an adverse judgment on a note, rendered against them jointly and severally by the Vanderburg Superior Court in favor of The National City Bank of Evansville (Bank), the plaintiff-appellee.

We affirm.

ISSUES

The issues presented for review are as follows:

1. Is the Bank's claim barred by the ten year statute of limitations; and

II. Is the evidence sufficient to sustain the decision of the trial court against Marylou's defense of non est factum regarding a guaranty agreement purportedly…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. English Coal Co., Inc. v. DurcholzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Colorado Kenworth Corporation v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. Burdick v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Denbina v. City of HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boczar v. Meridian Street FoundationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Rodenbeck v. Marathon Petroleum Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
  3. City of Logansport v. RemleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Master Copy & Reproduction Center, Inc. v. Copyrite, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Fultz v. NewkirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API