Uland v. National City Bank of Evansville
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendants-appellants Theodore B. Uland (Ted) and Marylou Uland (Marylou) appeal an adverse judgment on a note, rendered against them jointly and severally by the Vanderburg Superior Court in favor of The National City Bank of Evansville (Bank), the plaintiff-appellee.
We affirm.
ISSUES
The issues presented for review are as follows:
1. Is the Bank's claim barred by the ten year statute of limitations; and
II. Is the evidence sufficient to sustain the decision of the trial court against Marylou's defense of non est factum regarding a guaranty agreement purportedly…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- English Coal Co., Inc. v. DurcholzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Colorado Kenworth Corporation v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Burdick v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Denbina v. City of HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boczar v. Meridian Street FoundationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Rodenbeck v. Marathon Petroleum Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
- City of Logansport v. RemleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Master Copy & Reproduction Center, Inc. v. Copyrite, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Fultz v. NewkirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.