Legal Opinion
Rodenbeck v. Marathon Petroleum Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided July 19, 1990No. Civ. F 88-307PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Marathon Petroleum Company (Marathon) on December 28, 1989. The parties have fully briefed the issues and oral argument was held on June 7, 1990. For the following reasons the motion for summary judgment will be granted.
Summary Judgment
Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- The John S. Boyd Company, Inc. v. Boston Gas Company, New England Electric SystemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Purolator Products Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991
- Niecko v. Emro Marketing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Detrex Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Niecko v. Emro Marketing Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.