Legal Opinion

Lockett v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1991No. 57888, 57984PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

In this action, plaintiff, Robert Lockett, is suing a number of corporate manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos, corporate-defendants, alleging his exposure to their asbestos products caused him to contract asbestosis. In their answers, all of these corporate defendants have pleaded, as an affirmative defense, that plaintiff is barred' by the statute of limitations.

In a separate count, plaintiff is suing his original attorneys, defendant-attorneys, for legal malpractice. As to them, he alleges corporate-defendants have pleaded that his asbestosis claim is barred by the statute…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. Elmore v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Jepson v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Allison v. Sverdrup & Parcel & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. M & D ENTERPRISES, INC. v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Cook v. DeSoto Fuels, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Ray v. Upjohn Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API