Legal Opinion
Po Kee Wong v. United States Solicitor General
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 15, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1372PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendant United States Solicitor General’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his Complaint on July 28, 2011 requesting that the Court grant a number of unclear “orders” related to a wide variety of subject matter, including state retirement benefits, rejected patent applications, patent infringement, and tax refunds. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on December 12, 2011, arguing, among other things, that the Complaint should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1)…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cornish v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Dingler v. RobertsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- McMillan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019