Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Company v. Reinhardt

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 12, 1965No. Civ. 64-512PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

On January 4, 1963, plaintiff issued its Lawyers’ Professional Liability Policy, to defendants Reinhardt, Coblens and Stoll, partners engaged in the practice of law in the state of Oregon. Later, defendant Winkel was included as a named assured. The policy, among other things, provided as follows:

“I. Coverage

To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become obligated to pay by reason of the liability imposed upon him by law for damages resulting from any claim made against the insured arising out of the performance of professional services for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blohm v. Glens Falls InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. MacDonald v. United Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Omark Industries v. Safeco Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
  3. THOMAS J. SIBLEY v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1996
  4. Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation v. Justin N. Reinhardt, Seymour L. Coblens, Norman A. Stoll and Morton A. WinkelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. ReinhardtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API