Legal Opinion
State v. Roman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 10, 1991PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
248 N.J. Super. 144 (1991)
590 A.2d 686
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
BERNARDO B. ROMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 23, 1991.
Decided May 10, 1991.
Before Judges PRESSLER, BAIME and A.M. STEIN.
Martin C. Mooney, Sr., Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Stephen G. Raymond, Burlington County Prosecutor, attorney; Martin C. Mooney of counsel and on the brief).
Marcia Blum, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Wilfredo…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. D.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- State v. M.Z.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- State v. HamiltonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. P.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- State v. J.G.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- State v. D.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. MabenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- State ex rel. A.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.