Legal Opinion

Goltl v. Cummings

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 1, 1963No. 19932PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McWilliams.

Cummings and DuCharme brought suit against Walter and Edna Goltl, seeking specific performance, or if specific performance was found to be impossible, for damages. They alleged that the Goltls owned a tract of land consisting of some seven lots situated in Adams County, to which they had been granted an exclusive option to purchase for a total purchase price of $36,000; that in due time they had notified the Goltls of their election to exercise this option to purchase and were ready, willing and able to perform all of their obligations thereunder, but that the…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Amantiad v. OdumHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Shoels v. KleboldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. DiFrancesco v. Particle Interconnect Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Yaekle v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API