Grady v. Hughes
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent. (Burch, J.) Bill to set aside orders of the probate court allowing the final account of the defendant Hughes as administrator, and for his discharge, and for an accounting with said administrator, and the payment of the balance found due by defendant Houseman, one of his sureties, and defendant Hodenpyl, the executor of the other surety.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Kent. (Burch, J.) Bill to set aside orders of the probate court allowing the final account of the defendant Hughes as administrator, and for his discharge, and for an accounting with said administrator, and the payment of the balance found due by defendant Houseman, one of his sureties, and defendant Hodenpyl, the executor of the other surety. Complainants and defendant Hughes appeal from decree sustaining demurrers of Houseman and Hodenpyl, and overruling that of defendant Hughes. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in Grady v. Hughes, 64 Mich. 540.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
This case comes before us upon demurrers filed by defendants to the bill of complaint. The general demurrer for want of equity can only be considered.
Complainants are heirs at law of Jeremiah Grady, deceased. The defendants are Michael H. Hughes, who was the administrator of Jeremiah Grady, who died in November, 1872; Isabella Grady, who was the widow of Jeremiah Grady; Julius Houseman, who is the surety in the probate bond of Michael H. Hughes as administrator; and Anton G. Hodenpyl, who is the executor of Bichard E. Butterworth, who was the other surety in the administrator’s bond. Mary…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grady v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pennington v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Tudhope v. PottsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Ewing v. LamphereMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. BoydMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Doyle v. RingoIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.