Legal Opinion
New London County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Zachem
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 20, 2013No. AC 34538PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The defendants, Karleen Zachem and Phyllis Knutson, appeal from the trial court’s declaratory judgment holding that the plaintiff, New London County Mutual Insurance Company, has no duty to provide coverage under an insurance policy with the defendants for a claimed loss arising from an explosion and fire. The defendants claim that the court improperly concluded that their loss was excluded from coverage *162under a vandalism exception in the policy based on its erroneous determinations that (1) the defendants’ property had been vacant for more than thirty consecutive days at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- American Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Mildred DurrenceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- DeCarlo & Doll, Inc. v. DilozirConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Karas v. Liberty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Roberts v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Viking Construction, Inc. v. 777 Residential, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Warzecha v. USAA Casualty Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- American Commerce Insurance Co v. PanusDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.