Legal Opinion

Thor Food Service Corp. v. Makofske

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.

This nonjury action is predicated upon an alleged breach of a written retail installment contract entered into between plaintiff and the defendants. Defendants seek to resist payment upon the claim of fraud in the inducement.

The contract concerns plaintiff’s sale to defendants on the installment payment plan of a refrigerator-freezer combination at the agreed price of $1,342.80. Executed on March 15, 1960, the contract provides for 36 monthly installments of $37.30 each, *873commencing April 28, 1960, with acceleration of all payments, at plaintiff’s option, on 10 days’ continued default of any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Lynch v. GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Lynch v. Gibson, FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Benz v. KaderbeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wayne County Vinegar & Cider Corp. v. Schorr's Famous Pickled Products, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API