Legal Opinion · Dissent

Quillen v. Quillen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 23, 1995No. S95A1172Published

1DissentHunstein, Justice

This case marks a pivotal point in the direction this Court will follow in regard to divorce settlement agreements. Over my dissent, this Court has already allowed parties to circumvent the judicial process altogether by executing judicially-unsupervised contracts that resolve issues arising out of the dissolution of the marriage contract. Eickhoff v. Eickhoff, 263 Ga. 498 (435 SE2d 914) (1993). With the instant case this Court is now permitting parties, whose settlement agreement was incorporated into a divorce decree, to divest the trial court of all supervision over its decree by upholding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bank South, N.A. v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Kent v. KentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Eickhoff v. EickhoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Weaver v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  5. Garcia v. GarciaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API