Bailey v. Lloyd
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellant has failed to make the strong showing which is required of her to persuade this Court to reverse the trial judge’s order granting a new trial. The granting or denying of motion for a new trial rests in the sound judicial discretion of the trial judge and a presumption of correctness attaches to his order. -
We have repeatedly held that it requires a much stronger showing to reverse the trial judge when he has granted a motion for new trial than it does to reverse his order when it is one denying a new trial.
Affirmed upon authority of Mead v. Bentley, Fla. 61 So.2d 428, Martin v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Mead v. BentleySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Dent v. Margaret Ann Super MarketsSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Florida Coastal Theatres, Inc. v. BelflowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pix Shoes of Miami, Inc. v. HowarthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Ward v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Bush v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. LazarusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967