Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 16, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant has failed to make the strong showing which is required of her to persuade this Court to reverse the trial judge’s order granting a new trial. The granting or denying of motion for a new trial rests in the sound judicial discretion of the trial judge and a presumption of correctness attaches to his order. -

We have repeatedly held that it requires a much stronger showing to reverse the trial judge when he has granted a motion for new trial than it does to reverse his order when it is one denying a new trial.

Affirmed upon authority of Mead v. Bentley, Fla. 61 So.2d 428, Martin v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Mead v. BentleySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Dent v. Margaret Ann Super MarketsSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  4. Florida Coastal Theatres, Inc. v. BelflowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pix Shoes of Miami, Inc. v. HowarthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Ward v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Bush v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. LazarusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API