Legal Opinion
Mead v. Bentley
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 14, 1952PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
61 So.2d 428 (1952)
MEAD
v.
BENTLEY et al.
Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.
November 14, 1952.
Clayton, Arnow, Duncan & Johnston, Gainesville, for appellant.
Bentley & Shafer, Lakeland, for appellees.
HOBSON, Justice.
Bentley and Shafer, who are attorneys at law, instituted this action against Ralph V. Mead. In their complaint they allege that Mead, through his duly authorized agent, had employed them to represent him in connection with a General Court Martial judgment and sentence entered against him while a member of our armed forces stationed in Italy during World War II. Mead filed an answer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Dent v. Margaret Ann Super MarketsSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Boles v. BolesSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Florida Coastal Theatres, Inc. v. BelflowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Redditt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Mills v. Redwing Carriers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Bennett v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Hodge v. Jacksonville Terminal CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.