Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1900PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PROM KNOX. Appeal County. in error from Circuit Jos. W. Sneed, J. Court of Knox

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

Suit^ to recover damages for personal injuries, resulting in the death of plaintiff’s intestate. Defendant company pleaded, first, not guilty, and, second, the statute of limitations of one year.

Plaintiff by replication to defendant’s plea of the statute of limitations, avers that within twelve months after the cause of action accrued he brought suit against defendant company in the Circuit Court of Knox County. Thereupon defendant company, upoii the ground of nonresidence, removed said cause to the Circuit Court of the United States at Knoxville, where said cause pended until the September…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Kern v. HuidekoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Cox v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. Gassman v. JarvisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  2. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. BoltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Reed v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. La Follette Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. MintonTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Holbrook v. J. J. Quinlan & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API