Legal Opinion

Tiger v. Read

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1916No. 7433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poo, Judge. Action by George Tiger against Harlan Read and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRUNSON, C.

This action was commenced on the 11th day of January, A. D. 1910, in the district court of Tulsa county, by the filing of a petition by T. J. Dawson, as next friend of George Tiger, a minor, against the defendants in error in this action. In the petition it- is alleged that George Tiger is the owner of certain lands described therein, and that he is entitled to the immediate possession thereof; that the defendants, and each of them, are unlawfully keeping him out of the possession of the same.

For the purpose of this case it is not material as to what happened between the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Truskett v. ClosserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. France's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  3. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  4. Otis v. . ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Brewer v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Mortgage Debenture Co., Ltd. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. First State Bank of Hewitt v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API