Legal Opinion

People v. English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was properly tried in absentia. The court informed defendant of the trial date and stated: "It is necessary for you to be present at your trial. If you are not present your trial may proceed in your absence and you may be convicted in your absence.” That statement complied with the requirement enunciated in People v Parker (57 NY2d 136, 141) that, in order to effect a knowing and intelligent waiver, the defendant must be informed of "the consequences of failing to appear for trial.” Although the Court of Appeals in People v Parker (supra,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. LambAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. SquierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API