Legal Opinion

Matthew C. Stechauner v. Judy P. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 31, 2017No. 16-1079PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Matthew Stechauner seeks habeas relief from his Wisconsin convictions for second-degree reckless homicide and armed robbery. He argues that the Wisconsin appeals court unreasonably denied post-conviction relief despite alleged Miranda violations and ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court declined to hold an evidentiary hearing and denied Stechauner’s petition for habeas relief. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

On November 22, 2004, Stechauner was riding in a car with, friends. An unmarked police cruiser pulled up behind the car, and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Douglas Hicks v. Randall HeppCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Garner v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. Mission Measurement Corp. v. Blackbaud, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  4. James Westray v. Deanna BrookhartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  5. Tommy Clark v. Jacqueline LashbrookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API