Legal Opinion

Coley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1938Published

1Per curiam

The judgment below, upon the facts revealed in the record on this appeal, is in accordance with well settled legal principles as enunciated in numerous decisions of this Court, which here require no further elaboration. Pope v. R. R., 195 N. C., 61, 141 S. E., 350; Rives v. R. R., 203 N. C., 227, 165 S. E., 709; Young v. R. R., 205 N. C., 530, 172 S. E., 177; Rimmer v. R. R., 208 N. C., 198, 179 S. E., 753; Bullock v. R. R., 212 N. C., 760, and cases therein cited.

The factual situation in the Bives case, supra, is almost identical with the present case. In that case, despite that negligence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rimmer v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Pope v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Rives v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Young v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Bullock v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API