Legal Opinion
Farley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 30, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sullivan, J.
On February 6, 1964, Robert T. Farley, a 38-year-old margin clerk, was issued a Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereinafter Metlife) family policy, number 646 201 504 M. This single document provided insurance coverage for Robert, his wife Anna and each of their three sons Michael, Dennis and Brian. The insurance on Robert was endowment insurance which would pay $3,000 to his widow in the event of his death or to him if he was still living on February 6, 2011. The insurance on his wife Anna was a combination term insurance and endowment insurance which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilkinson v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. of DetroitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Tannenbaum v. Provident Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Trainor v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Farley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Ambassador Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- In Re September 11th Liability Insurance Coverage CasesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Choczner v. William Penn Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Somers v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Van Der Heyde v. First Colony Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.