Legal Opinion
Farley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided August 2, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously modified by directing judgment to be entered in favor of plaintiff on the first cause of action and in favor of the defendant on the second cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover amounts alleged to be due under the terms of two policies of insurance issued by the defendant on the life of her husband. Since there is no factual dispute as to the surrender, prior to the death of the insured, of the policy involved in the second cause of action, the defendant is entitled to summary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rhine v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Schuster v. . Dutchess County Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- O'Connell v. Eastern Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mazur v. GaudetDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
- Farley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. LomolinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985