Legal Opinion

Michael Cuero v. Matthew Cate

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2017No. 12-55911Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL DANIEL CUERO, No. 12-55911 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:08-cv-02008-BTM-WMC MATTHEW CATE, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted August 5, 2015 Pasadena, California Filed March 8, 2017 Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Barry G. Silverman, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges. Order; Concurrence by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge Callahan 2 CUERO V. CATE SUMMARY* Habeas…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API