Legal Opinion

Bentley v. Fayas

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The question is whether a certain truck owned by the defendant Henry Fayas, involved in the accident upon which the cause of action is based, was within the provisions of the defendant Milwaukee Automobile Insurance Company policy and afforded coverage to the defendant Henry Fayas!

Fayas was a private contract motor carrier holding a license as such from the public service commission of Wisconsin. The defendant insurer issued an indemnity policy to him, to which was attached the following rider:

“This policy is. issued in order to assure compliance by the assured as a common motor carrier of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rusch v. MielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Transport Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Drake v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Peterson v. SchmudeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Drake v. PENNSYLVANIA THRESHER. & F. MUT. CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API