Legal Opinion
Diebold, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 3, 1995No. C9-95-793PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
In this action by Diebold, Incorporated (Diebold) against Roadway Express, Inc. (Roadway) for contribution and indemnity, the district court determined that Roadway was liable for ten percent of Diebold’s attor ney fees incurred in defending the underlying action. Roadway has appealed from the judgment, and Diebold has filed a notice of review, requesting 100% of its attorney fees incurred in defending the underlying action. Diebold also challenges the district court’s denial of its request for attorney fees incurred in pursuing this action against Roadway for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Harms v. Independent School District No. 300Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Sorenson v. Safety Flate, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Seifert v. Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Farmers Union Oil Company of Rolla, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Burlington Northern v. Farmers Union OilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. Bradshaw Construction Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2025