State v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
PlERRON, J.:
David W. Peterson appeals his upward durational departure sentence. He claims the district court erred at the original sentencing hearing by failing to state on the record the substantial and compelling reasons for departure and that the court should not be allowed to remedy that error at a rehearing. We affirm.
This is the second time this case comes before this court. The events of this case are outlined in State v. Peterson, 22 Kan. App. 2d 572, 920 P.2d 463 (1996). In brief, Peterson performed odd jobs for Ruby and Leland Peck. Both of the Pecks were 75 years old at the time.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- State v. Salcido-CorralSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- State v. RinckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
- State v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.