Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rostollan (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Daniel J. Rostollan)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2018No. 2016AP001890-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1 We review Referee Jonathan V. Goodman's amended report recommending that this court suspend Attorney Daniel J. Rostollan's license to practice law in Wisconsin for a period of two years and direct him to pay restitution as well as the costs of this proceeding.

¶ 2 No appeal has been filed so we review the referee's report pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.17(2). After conducting an independent review of the matter, we agree that Attorney Rostollan should be deemed to have defaulted, we accept and adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are based on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. RamthunWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thompson (In Re Thompson)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William H. GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API