Cts Corporation v. Piher International Corporation and Piher Sociedad Anonima
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Circuit Judge.
Appellants contend that the district court erroneously rejected their attacks on the validity of the ’604 1 and ’285 2 patents on variable resistance controls and erroneously found that their “PT— 15” trimmer infringed the former patent. The ’604 patent discloses a flared bearing used as a dust excluding seal of an aperture in the housing enclosing the control. The ’285 patent describes a mechanical assembly which uses a metallic collector — an essential component of the control — as the base of the housing.
The principal issues on appeal are (1) whether one of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Amphenol Corporation, a Corporation of Delaware v. General Time Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Dart Industries, Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Frantz Manufacturing Company, and v. Phenix Manufacturing Company, Inc., AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Raytheon Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Roper Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Umc Electronics Company v. The United States, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.