United States v. Reeves
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FULTON, Senior Judge:
The issue to be resolved in this case is whether, when a military judge acts as a military magistrate for determination of the legality of an accused’s continued pretrial confinement in accordance with Army regulations pertaining to that function, he necessarily becomes an “investigating officer” within the meaning of Article 26(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 826(d) (1976), and, therefore, is ineligible to act as military judge in the subsequent trial of the accused. On the basis of our previous holding in United States v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- Courtney v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. HeardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. BradleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. KalscheuerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. RiceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983