Legal Opinion

Alexander v. General Ins. Co. of America

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 11, 1938No. 6967-RJPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenney, District Judge

(after stating the facts and summarizing the arguments as above, renders the following opinion).

In order for the plaintiff to recover, he must show that the terms of the insurance policy in question were subsequently modified, that the breach of condition was waived, or that some conduct on the part of the defendant or its authorized agents so misled the plaintiff to his detriment ás to give rise to an estoppel.

The only agent of the defendant with whom - plaintiff dealt before the loss was the witness Beere (representing Beere & Purves, Inc.) who had sold plaintiff the policy, and who had, on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Sun Insurance Office v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. MacKintosh v. Agricultural Fire Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Steil v. Sun Insurance OfficeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riteway Carriers, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Ins.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
  2. Oriole Paper Box Co. v. Reliance InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. Gawecki v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
  4. Oriole Paper Box Company, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance Company Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API