In re the Marriage of Friedman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentStaring, Presiding Judge
¶ 27 The fact that in many instances children benefit from relationships with their grandparents is not at issue. The issue is whether circumstances exist that permit the state to interfere with parental decision-making and compel those relationships. Because the majority impermissibly diminishes the constitutional presumption favoring the decisions of fit parents, I dissent.
¶ 28 The majority correctly observes that parents enjoy a fundamental liberty interest under the Fourteenth Amendment to the “care, custody, and control of their children,” with a “presumption that fit parents act in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.