Legal Opinion
Gipstein v. Kirshenbaum
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1934PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
According to the finding, after such requested corrections as we are able to make, the facts of which the plaintiff offered evidence and claimed to have proved include the following which are material to a discussion of the assignments of error: On December 21st, 1932, the defendant owned a two-family house, purchased in February, 1932, and occupied the first floor; the plaintiff for about two months had been a tenant of the second floor, and each used two rooms on the third floor. A rear stairway leading from the first to the second and third floors was under the control and supervision of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Welz v. ManzilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Majestic Theater Company v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Fuller v. AndrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beckwith v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Dean v. HershowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Petrizzo v. Commercial Contractors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Goodman v. Norwalk Jewish Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Corrievau v. Associated Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.