Legal Opinion

Owen v. Mariott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The trustee in bankruptcy has been substituted for defendant on this appeal. For purposes of convenience we will refer to defendant as though it were Simmons individually.

*324Plaintiffs as the owners and defendant as operator were parties to a timber cutting contract. The contract was executed in April 1957. It required defendant to remove- all of the timber from land owned by-plaintiffs before December 1, 1958. The contract also required defendant to deliver the better grades of logs to a United States Plywood Corporation mill. Defendant began Operation in May 1957. In early January 1958,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Timmins v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Pelton v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hecketsweiler v. ParrettOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Anderson v. PhegleyOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Woodburn Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Beneficial Finance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API