Hubbard v. Lee
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing to vacate a judgment, to amend the conclusions of law and direct judgment for appellant upon the findings. John E. Richards, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff!, as assignee of Hubbard and Carmichael Bros., materialmen, to foreclose a lien in the sum of $1894.90, for materials used in constructing certain buildings upon the property of defendants’ intestate, Eugene A. Lee, who was one of the original defendants in the action, but has died since the action was brought. The contractors, Hastings & Son, are also defendants, but made no defense other than to file a formal answer. Plaintiff also sought a personal judgment against Lee for the sum of $1894.90, basing this claim upon a notice given Lee, on June 26, 1906,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Turner v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Nichols v. CulverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
- McIntyre v. TrautnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Cole v. UhlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
- Stidger v. McPheeColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doherty v. CarruthersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Frederick County National Bank v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- C. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Interiors Contracting, Inc. v. Smith, Halander & Smith AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- C. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.