Legal Opinion
Atchison, T. &. S. F. Ry. Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 6, 1925No. 14946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
Seven specifications of error are contained in the assignments of error in this case, but they are not presented and argued seriatim in the briefs and will not be so considered here. The gist of the argument for vacation of the order complained of is based on two propositions, thus stated in the second and fourth specifications of error:
“The Corporation Commission of Oklahoma erred in making said order No. 2263, and in each and every part thereof.
“Said order No. 2263, and each and every part thereof, is unreasonable, unjust and contrary to law.”
These two propositions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Oklahoma City v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Board of Com'rs of Garfield Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Southern Surety Co. v. WaitsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Southwestern Surety Ins. Co v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Durkee's WillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Tulsa Tribune Co. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Norcom v. MinorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936