Legal Opinion
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 1, 1928No. 14946PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
A rehearing was granted in this cause on October 25, 1927. By inadvertence the former opinion of this court, speaking through Commissioner Logsdon, was re-¡ ported in 115 Okla. 158, 241 Pac. 776.
This is an appeal from order 2263, promulgated September 12, 1923, in cause No., 4952, Corporation Commission, state of Okla-| homa (1924 Annual Report, 357), prescribing rates on coal from certain northeastern! Oklahoma mines to Dewey, Okla., and fixed, on a ho sis of the applicable interstate rates from Kansas and Missouri mines to Dewey.-, This matter is corollary to that of A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Markle v. StekollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- City of Tulsa v. State Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Nowata Oil Syndicate v. Commercial Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Thompson v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952