Carney v. Bigham
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered January 8, 1908, in favor of the plaintiffs, upon stipulated facts, in an action of ejectment.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
— The respondents, who were plaintiffs below, brought this action to recover possession and quiet title to certain real property,, situated in the city of Seattle, of which the appellants had possession, and which they were claiming under a tax deed issued by King county, in a tax foreclosure proceeding.
The fa,cts were stipulated by the parties, and were in substance these: On and prior to June 3, 1901, the respondents were the owners in fee of the property in question, the title standing of record in the name of the husband,' John E. Carney. The land had been listed for taxation on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rowland v. EskelandWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Anderson v. TuratiWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Sherman v. SchomberWashington Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rosholt v. County of SnohomishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Langley v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Salts v. SaltsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
- Title and Trust Co. v. Columbia Basin Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
- Cashman v. BrowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.