Legal Opinion

H. R. Kamm & Co. v. W. E. Sloan & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1905No. 14,367PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

The plaintiff, W. E. Sloan, who was doing business under the name of W. E. Sloan & Co., recovered judgment for damages resulting to him from a breach of contract by defendants, and they prosecute error. The plaintiff pleaded an offer made to him at Wichita, Kan., by the defendants at New Castle, Colo., to sell and ship to him at Wichita six cars of potatoes of a particular kind and quality, for a given price, shipments to begin on or about October 26, 1903, and his acceptance of defendants’ proposition, and a neglect and refusal by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. EaganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Myer v. MoonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Stevens v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. DaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDermott v. HalleckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Williamson v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Moore v. OwensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Ryan v. Beaver CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API