Legal Opinion

Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. Eagan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1902No. 12,466PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Miami district court; John T. Bueeis, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dostee, C. J. :

This was an action brought by Mark Eagan against the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad Company, to recover damages for injuries received by him at the hand of the company’s employees while riding as a passenger on one of its trains. The plaintiff got on the train at Kansas City to go to Plillsdale. A drunken man likewise got aboard at Kansas City. He was disagreeable in his conduct in the coach in which he was riding and was removed by the trainmen to another coach. The plaintiff was in that coach. The drunken man made efforts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mahaney v. St. Louis & Hannibal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. State ex inf. Crow v. VallinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PointerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GowerTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. BinionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. ShanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Carlile v. BentleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Van Pelt v. Richards Paint & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Wallace v. SkinnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Culbertson v. SheridanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API