Legal Opinion

Blazer v. Freedman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1931No. 23174. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— Respondents, suing by guardians ad litem, on February 7, 1930, were, respectively, fifteen years past and seventeen years past, of age. They sue to recover damages for injuries occurring, in daylight, on February 7,1930, when riding as guests in a wreck ing car owned by appellants and driven by one Snn-rider, an employee of appellants. Tbe wrecking car collided with another automobile at the intersection of Nickerson street and west Dravus street, in Seattle.

Sunrider was directed to drive the wrecker to get a disabled car at 4119 Phinney avenue, Seattle, and tow it back to the place of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bauer v. TougawWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Sharp v. SproatSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Cable v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Hemington v. HemingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wayson v. Rainier Taxi Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Layman v. HeardOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Young v. WhebyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Renfro v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  4. Friedman v. FriedmanArizona Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API