Legal Opinion

Seum v. Osborne

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided September 28, 2018No. Civil No. 3:17-cv-00069-GFVTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and insufficient service of process / lack of personal jurisdiction. [R. 10.] For the reasons that follow, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss will be DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.

I

Plaintiff Dan Seum, Jr., a resident of Kentucky, is a citizen advocate and was once the Director of Veteran's Affairs at Kentucky for Medicinal Marijuana (Ky4MM), "a non-profit organization working…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
  2. Taylor v. NeffDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
  3. haggart v. DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API